Teresa Becher on Traffic Safety in California
Teresa Becher is the Interim
Director of the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). In a recent
exchange, she described her work at OTS, her previous experience at
the California Highway Patrol, current OTS Priorities, and the state
of traffic safety in California.
How did you become interested in
traffic safety?
I joined the
California Highway Patrol in 1989, and what left a tremendous impact
on me was responding to the numerous, gruesome collisions that could
have been avoided.
Could you tell me more about your
work at CHP? What first brought you there?
I did my road
time in the Lake Arrowhead area and Monterey. Afterward, I worked in
CHP’s Legislative Unit and Special Projects. I was first recruited
out of Inland Division in 1989; the CHP has proven to be the best
choice I have ever made.
You have served as
interim director at OTS since late 1999. Could you describe the
transition and how your work at OTS and CHP relate to or complement
one another?
As a Lieutenant
in Special Projects, I ran the grants program for the CHP. I became
that department’s expert on the Intermodel Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act (ISTEA), and on TEA-21. So while I knew a lot about
grants, the transition came when I had to see the larger picture from
a multi-agency perspective. My work at OTS and the CHP is
interconnected. Both have similar missions: to save lives and reduce
injuries from traffic crashes.
How have OTS
priorities changed since you have been interim director? What brought
this about?
One of the major
changes is our focus on community outreach, in terms of funding
community-based organizations. I share the Davis Administration’s
goal to utilize grass-roots community organizations to affect the
underserved and over-represented groups in traffic safety.
California’s traffic fatality rates are among the lowest in the
nation. You’ve written that California’s traffic safety success was
achieved through tough legislation, increased enforcement, and grants
for community education – clearly, a combined effort involving many
different types of agencies. How did traffic safety become a statewide
priority? What was done to get so many stakeholders to ‘buy in’ to the
importance of traffic safety?
Traffic safety
has been a statewide priority for years. Through the leadership of
agencies like the CHP, Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control, the OTS, and Business, Transportation &
Housing, the Administration has made transportation and traffic safety
a top priority. For example, occupant protection in the late 1980s
and early 1990s became a priority for California as a key strategy to
save lives. Lead agencies for traffic safety such as the CHP and OTS
built a statewide seat belt task force that brought key stakeholders
to the table. This partnership approach mobilized California and
helped pass legislation that had a direct impact on the issue.
Do you have any
specific recommendations to other states trying to achieve higher
occupant protection rates?
I would encourage
the use of appropriate data and analysis to determine who is not
buckling up. Secondly, I would recommend the formation of
partnerships to reach out to key stakeholders at the grassroots level
to effect change.
What have the barriers to
improving traffic safety been?
Keeping the
public and media focused on traffic safety. Last year, over
3,900 people were killed in collisions in California. But since they
weren’t killed in a single event, the focus is fragmented.
What do you feel is still needed?
Innovative
ideas! California has always been a national leader in traffic safety
innovation. New ideas are only fresh for so long. Today’s world is
technologically advanced and fast-paced. You need new ideas every six
months to stay ahead of the curve.
What are your personal goals or
areas of interest related to traffic safety?
Anyone who knows
me knows my focus is DUI and occupant protection. DUI, because it is
a pointless, senseless crime, and because 37 percent of all crashes
are alcohol-involved. Occupant Protection, because it has a huge
impact on traffic safety.
Are there any
current traffic safety approaches or projects that you’re especially
excited about?
We’re very
excited about the California Seat Belt Compliance Campaign (CSBCC),
the state’s most aggressive and comprehensive program ever to increase
seat belt use. The CHP, OTS, and local law enforcement agencies are
joining together in a $4 million effort to raise California’s seat
belt use to 92 percent in 2003. The campaign includes two
mobilizations – the recently concluded November mobilization, and
another one May 19-26 (over Memorial Day weekend). We’re directing
approximately $1 million to locals in the form of mini-grants, and the
remaining $2.9 million for two, month-long statewide public awareness
efforts to get the word out.
What are some emerging traffic
safety issues within OTS?
We have long
recognized that with the maturing “Baby Boomer” generation, there
comes an increased population of older drivers. OTS believes in
taking a pro-active approach to preventing traffic related injuries
and deaths in this group. We’ve partnered with the Center for Injury
Prevention Policy and Practice, San Diego State University, and, the
Automobile Club of Southern California to develop a coordinated
approach to preventing traffic-related injuries and fatalities among
older adults.