|
|
||
Other stories this issue:
Getting America To Buckle Up
Measuring Safety Measures
Making Child Safety Seats Part of a
Prescription for Good Health
Checkups for Kids—and Their
Car Seats
The "Forgotten
Child" Is Getting Some Attention
An Interview with
David Manning
Printable PDF Version of this article of newsletter (789 KB) Other issues of the TSC newsletter
|
For the first
time anywhere, a standardized, statistically robust evaluation tool is
being made available to local recipients of traffic safety grants so
that they can measure their programs' effectiveness, thanks to a
project funded by the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) and
implemented by the UC Berkeley Traffic Safety Center. The survey package was prompted by several needs. Many local agencies do not have the funds to support evaluation efforts. Even if they do, many do not have staff members with the necessary expertise in statistics and program evaluation to produce usable, meaningful results. Finally, when local agencies do conduct evaluations, their methods are not always consistent with one another, which makes comparing results difficult, if not impossible. In order to get the best overall understanding of statewide usage rates, a more standard survey is required. The local use of standardized tools is expected to enhance occupant safety within the state, and the protocol for the evaluation will provide an important model for other studies (such as misuse of child restraints, for example). "Community or city-wide surveys are important for understanding what use looks like on the local level. With this information we will be able to target those areas for interventions."--Jill Cooper
Many states, including California, have developed methodologies for evaluation at the statewide level, but none has created a survey protocol such as this that can be used on a local or city level. Jill Cooper, Program Manager of the Traffic Safety Center, describes the importance of that distinction. "Under the current system, data on smaller areas and cities are not available. The statewide survey is critical for capturing the average rate of seatbelt use for the state. Community or city-wide surveys are important for understanding what use looks like on the local level. With this information we will be able to target those areas for interventions." The survey kits show the user how to construct a protocol that establishes a baseline rate of compliance by means of a "before" survey. It includes instructions on how to physically organize the survey (usually in teams of two or more observers at a curbside location), and how to choose a location and time. Also included is an explanation of how to conduct a follow-up survey to see if usage has increased after the intervention-for example, a child safety seat fair at day care center. It also provides the forms for collecting data, and matrices and formulas for determining how many observations will be needed and ways to calculate the statistical certainty of a specific survey's results. "It is imperative that the programs we fund show results," says Murphy. "Often the question comes up 'Do your programs work, and how do you know?" This type of standardized survey will be effective at showing how successful such interventions are. Also, as Murphy explains, "Grants that can show measurable results are the types of programs that we would encourage other agencies to adopt." The kits will be incorporated into the support materials that OTS provides all recipients of traffic safety grants and will be posted on the OTS Web site for downloading. Murphy
concludes, "To be the first state that I know of to complete this task
is really gratifying, and I'm thrilled that it will be something that
will have the UC Berkeley name on it to add to its credibility"
|
|