|
|
||
Related Links: Traffic Safety Center Sonoma Study summary Other stories this issue: Older Adults Are Driving Transportation Policy Making Oakland Safer for Older Pedestrians Getting to the Heart of Aging and Mobility Download
PDF of this page
|
Aging
Behind the Wheel
An epidemiological look at the older driver Interview
with Traffic Safety Center Director David Ragland, head of the
Sonoma Study on Older Travelers' Driving Behavior (Predictors of Driving Behavior and Adverse Driving Outcomes in an With funding from the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the National Institute of
Aging, UC Berkeley Traffic Safety Center Director David Ragland is heading
a project that uses data collected from a longitudinal epidemiological
study of some 2,000 adults 55 and older in Sonoma, CA, to examine how
their driving behavior and their safety behind the wheel change as they
age. A key goal is to tease out
the significance of various physical limitations and medical conditions
distinct from the driver's chronological age. "Age per se doesn't
cause anything by itself," Ragland notes. "That's why it's
important to pull apart the functional status, medical conditions, and
performance measures, independently from age, so that we don't have
to use chronological age to determine whether or not you can successfully
drive." Ragland hopes to use the findings to develop measures to
assess drivers' fitness that are more reliable than the current ones
based on chronological age. Behaviors that the study will examine include:
Drivers' conditions that the study will examine for their effects on driving ability and safety include:
The study will also try to
determine how cessation of driving by older people affects their social
and support networks that provide access to shopping, medical visits,
recreation, socializing with friends and family and attending entertainment
events, political events, classes and religious services. Ragland discussed the study
in the following interview conducted by TSC staff member Melanie Abrahams
with assistance from TSC project coordinator Tammy Wilder. What were the origins of the study? The basic idea of this project
was to get information on a lot of variables within this 55-and-older
demographic. That includes medical conditions, functional status, physical
activity, several types of social variables, social support, and marital
status. In the course of doing this epidemiological research, the researchers
at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration obtained a lot
of information on driving habits.There
was a baseline exam in the early 1990s, and since then they've done
three other waves of data collection on the same people. This means
that we've got longitudinal data on about 2,000 people. I think this study is important
to traffic safety because there is ample evidence that as one grows
older, functional status changes quite a bit. Reaction time, vision,
virtually everything changes, and these are all things that interfere
with the ability to carry out a complex task such as driving. One issue that is important
in this research is whether it's age per se that limits driving habits,
or if it's really medical conditions and functional limitations that
might correlate with age, but aren't precisely linked with age itself.
It very well could be that you could grow older chronologically and
not have any of these conditions that limit you, and it might be that
you're younger and have these limitations. That's why it's important
to pull apart the functional status, medical conditions, and performance
measures, independently from age, so that we don't have to use chronological
age to determine whether or not you can successfully drive. Return
to list of questions. What
is new about this study? There has been quite a bit
of data gathered, but there are things still to learn. We are looking
at two variables, driving behavior and adverse outcomes. Whether you
drive, how much you drive, when you drive, and whether you limit your
driving for various reasons is linked to whether you experience adverse
outcomes, such as getting citations, getting into crashes, and so forth.
They are related because if you limit your driving behavior, you are
less likely to get into a crash. We want to look at these
two variables and link them to drivers' functional status and health.
Although there are quite a few studies on driving behavior, which try
to predict driving outcomes or link various factors to driving cessation
or limitation, there are a lot of medical conditions, and one has to
systematically test each of these to see what the impact is on adverse
driving outcomes. There ought to be some more systematic studies that
look at different medical conditions and different driving outcomes
in relation to different demographic groupsurban, rural, and so
forth. What
have been some of the major reasons you have found for driving cessation
or limitation? Have the people in your study been limiting their driving
mainly based on medical concerns? For driving limitations and
driving cessation, we have looked at a range of medical conditions and
then at a range of non-medical conditions. Among various other medical
conditions, we've asked about vision, hearing, fatigue, and attention
problems. By far, the most important condition that people mention is
vision: 30 percent, 40 percent, even 50 percent of the people questioned,
depending on their demographic within our test group, mention it. For
all the other medical conditions, a very small percentage, like 1 percent
or 2 percent, give them as a reason for limiting or stopping their driving.
Among the non-medical conditions,
people have been telling us that they limit driving because they're
afraid of being in an accident or causing an accident, and because they
are afraid of crime. Interestingly, a large number of people say that
they limit their driving simply because they don't have a place to go.
We don't know if that's because there aren't the civic activities designed
for that age group that there could be in our communities, or if it's
because they simply don't want to go out. What
are the policy implications of you finding that vision is a leading
reason that people stop or limit their driving? Does this suggest a
strategy for extending people's driving years? Absolutely. One obvious solution
would be better kinds of glasses and correctional devices designed for
individual use. The second would be different kinds of mirror systems
that give a driver a wide-angle view or a better view that doesn't have
blind spots, and things like this. A third kind of solution would be
highway improvements such as larger signs and clearer markings on the
road. And
those improvements would help all drivers? Yes, this is what we're hoping. Do
you think that you've seen any indication of older drivers limiting
their driving simply because they think that that is the appropriate
thing to do, regardless of their actual ability? We think that there are numbers
of people who stop driving before they really need to because through
stereotypes enforced either by the media or through people's cultural
expectations, they're not thought of as being safe drivers anymore.
Just making a mistake that anybody might make, if you're an older driver,
might cause you to label yourself as unsafe or for others to label you
as unsafe. On the other hand, there are people who don't stop soon enough,
who deny or don't notice the decrease in function taking place and delay
making changes when in fact they should. It seems that we have both
kinds of errors here, and with increased information from our research,
fewer of these might happen. So
there could be younger drivers who should limit their driving, but don't,
because they don't perceive themselves as old enough to be experiencing
age-related decreases in driving abilities? Exactly, and other people
may not perceive younger, potentially dangerous drivers that way, either.
An underlying theme of our research and other studies like this is to
identify the factors besides age per se that affect driving, because
age per se doesn't cause anything by itself. It's factors such as vision
that actually are linked directly to driving ability. Who
will be influenced by this research, or who will find it the most valuable?
We hope that a range of people
will find this useful. We hope that we can start with the drivers themselves.
If they are aware of the factors that affect people's driving on average,
they may be prepared to make informed decisions about what they should
do in their own driving habits. We hope that health care providers might
find these results valuable, insofar as they can examine people and
evaluate them with respect to what kinds of functions they can perform
safely in relation to their driving. Another group is engineers, the
people who design vehicles and roadways. Finally, we would hope that
policymakers would also find these results valuableespecially
those people who make decisions about licensing and driving regulations
and exams for testing people's ability to drive. What
would be a valuable next step? Our sample is limited to
people living in a fairly small town surrounded by rural areas. This
kind of study should be repeated in urban areas and suburban areas with
different population groups. I suspect that there will be differences
in driving patterns, in the roadway systems, in alternative modes of
transportation available, in the distances people have to go, in traffic
conditions. Absolutely, we think that these kinds of studies should
be done in different places around the country. How are
you getting out the word? Traffic Safety Center Sonoma Study summary Download
PDF of this page |
|